beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.08.18 2015구합20495

특별교육이수등처분취소

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs and K were enrolled in the sixth year of J elementary school in 2014.

B. On November 11, 2014, Plaintiff A and D, while taking sports classes with the same anti-school students, including K et al., sent to K for gambling. As a result, Plaintiff A and D sent the phrase “sports teachers”, and Plaintiff A and D sent the phrase.

C. The plaintiff A and D had a tending from sports teachers and had a view to K. They had an interview with K. They sought a counseling teacher to find the counseling teacher, and the counseling teacher was asked from K for speech violence and bullying, and received it as school violence. D.

On November 27, 2014, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) deliberated on school violence caused by defamation, verbal violence, and bullying with K as an agenda, and the executive secretary of the autonomous committee spreaded vain, and has a relation with the same half-day group as the one in which K used the phrase “gras” to the same half-year group after K became the sixth year. Other students were music at the cleaning time, and there were several times, and the Plaintiff et al. did not have any objection against the students different from the other in-house group. At each time, the Plaintiff et al. al. provided the Plaintiff et al. with an desire to take part in the school teacher, etc., and provided the Plaintiff et al. with an desire to take part in the school, and provided the Plaintiff et al. with an opportunity to take part in the school.

As a result of deliberation, the autonomous committee recognized the plaintiffs' acts as school violence and decided to submit documents and measures to K to the plaintiffs.

(e) Accordingly.