If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. At around 05:10 on December 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sought to enter the distribution of the church by drinking at the C church conference located in Yongsan-si B; (b) had the right to church located in front of the entrance of the 1st floor of the church, saying, the Defendant was forced to enter the church, saying, “I am off again the church,” and interfered with the disturbance, such as “I nicking the freedom of religion,” and passing the noise,” and (c) had intruded the above D’s inside the above church managed by the victim E, who is the assistant to the church.

2. At around 05:30 on the same day, the Defendant received 112 report that “The foregoing male, who had taken the place, intends to enter the church continuously,” and asked him to return home from a slope belonging to the F District Unit, who rejected it, and continued to enter the church, and continued to enter the above G to enter the church. The Defendant committed assault, such as the vehicle where the above G was the head of the defect in order to arrest him as a flagrant offender, and the head of the body was sealed and walked to the bridge with his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement E, the police statement E, each written on-site photo of the H prepared, the closure photographs of the Cridge CCTV images, and the investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there is no particular criminal record in addition to the period of punishment under the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.