2. In light of the circumstances leading up to the Defendant’s confession in the appellate court, however, to the late confession, the confession in the appellate court cannot be deemed to be a change in circumstances to the extent that the mitigation of sentencing is necessary.

In addition, the defendant argued that he paid a certain amount each month after he was detained on October 2018, but the repayment of some of the amount of damage was already reflected in the sentencing of the court below.

In light of the conditions of sentencing and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the instant records and pleadings, even if the Defendant considered all the circumstances asserted as the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. Conclusion, pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.