When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as the claim for construction cost against the Defendant of Plaintiff C, No. 34842 of the above court at the court No. 408 of the Ulsan District Court No. 55, Ulsan District Court No. 408 of the above court No. 34842, Oct. 16, 2015.

In the court where the above case was tried, the defendant's agent's "whether or not the defendant D has contracted as a representative of a medical corporation or as an individual."

“I were an individual at the time to question”.

The plaintiff testified as ", at the time of the contract of this case, the plaintiff was unaware of the fact that the defendant was preparing for the establishment of a medical corporation, and there was no difference in whether the defendant was an individual hospital or a medical foundation in preparation for the opening of the hospital.

It is known that “I had known that I had not been aware of influence” in the question “.”

The presiding judge testified that “the establishment was authorized at the time of the use of the contract” and stated that “the establishment was approved” of the presiding judge.

“I have failed to answer the question.”

It is necessary to give testimony, and again, whether the Plaintiff’s agent stated that the medical corporation was established at the time of the preparation of the contract on September 1, 2014, or that the Plaintiff C was aware of the witness at that time.

I know that “In that time, I had different knowledge” and C had different knowledge.

Each testimony was made.

However, around September 1, 2014, at the time of the construction contract between C and E by the above medical corporation, the medical corporation was permitted to be established in the name of the president of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the defendant was well aware of the process of the medical corporation's implementation and the fact of the permission for the establishment of the medical corporation while carrying out the general business for the establishment

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Partial statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;