If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 15, 2013, the Defendant driving a sealed 3 freight vehicle, driving the above vehicle around 14:50 on May 15, 2013, and driving it over two-lanes with a signal apparatus installed in the middle of the sub-sections from the Jeju bank.

Although a driver has a duty of care to report an intersection signal well and prevent an accident by driving in accordance with the signals as instructed by the signal apparatus, the Defendant neglected this duty and caused negligence in violation of the stop signal and thereby discovered and immediately operated a DNA rocketing car of the C driver who turns to the left to the intersection in accordance with the moving signal from the Madle Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives to the right side of the damaged vehicle. However, the Defendant did not avoid, but did not avoid, and did not conflict with the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle with the front part of the damaged vehicle.

The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E on board the above C driving vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as a brush, closedness, and a brushing of the 2nd trend, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, diagnostic certificates, and practical survey reports;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;