However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of Category B New Zealand XD.

At around 23:50 on February 14, 2013, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance, and proceeded in the direction of this water in front of the exit of the 13th area located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu, Seoul, in front of the exit of the 300-1 area.

In this case, the defendant who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle that is driven by living well on the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds in the same direction as the negligent negligence.

The part of the back-of-car part of the car driven by the victim C(30 years old) who was driven by the victim C(30 years old) was received as the front part of the Defendant driver's vehicle, and the above damaged vehicle was pushed in the future, and the part of the back-of-life part of the F vehicle driven by the victim E(41 years old) was resumed.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, suffered from the injury of light salt teams, etc. in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment to the above C (30 years of age), and suffered from the injury of light salt teams in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the above E (41 years of age), and “2,98,765 won” as stated in the indictment in KRW 2,298,765, is a clerical error of “2,298,765 won”.

Each damage was made to cover the amount of 474,712 won of the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle F car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application for carbon of C;

1. A traffic accident report1, 2;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each vehicle estimate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and Article 8 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty;