If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who produces and distributes bean products in his/her trade name.

When it is intended to produce and distribute bean products, no act of making a false indication of origin or making an indication that may cause confusion as to it shall be prohibited.

Nevertheless, during the period from January 2015 to April 2015, the Defendant cultivated and packed 2,000 km from the North Korea Branch of the Association of the Association of the Association of the Association of the Association of the Association of the Association of the United States raw materials for the Republic of Korea at the same address as above, and cultivated and distributed 30 million won for the Republic of Korea, as if he cultivated by using music farming methods and shots domestically, and as if he cultivated by using music farming methods and shots, the Defendant cultivated and distributed c0 million won for all at the ma and restaurant located at the time of So-Eup, such as the D

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on investigation intelligence;

1. A report on the arrival of internal organs;

1. Each report on internal investigation (31 pages, 36 pages, 38 pages);

1. Each investigation report (39 pages, 202 pages of investigation records);

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Copy of business registration certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of trading statements;

1. Relevant Article 14 of the Act on the Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (1) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is when the defendant all commits the crime of this case, when the defendant has no criminal records like the defendant, and when the defendant has economic difficulties, etc. under the favorable circumstances to the defendant, there is a need for strict punishment of social harm such as the act of false indication of origin like the crime of this case's crime of this case's violation of the consumer's right food choice and trust, and harm the sound order of distribution of agricultural products, etc., and the fact that it cannot be said that the transfer of the goods provided by the defendant is not possible, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant.