2. In full view of various circumstances, including the fact that the defendants acquired the money by deception through the crime of this case, the amount of 395 million won, Defendant A did not yet agree with the victim, Defendant B agreed with the victim in the original trial but did not have yet been fully recovered from the damage, Defendant A was punished once for the same crime, Defendant B was punished with a fine of the same kind, Defendant B was punished three times for the same crime, and Defendant B had the record of being punished for the suspension of the execution of imprisonment twice for the same crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court seems to be appropriate, and thus, the above allegation of unfair sentencing by the defendants is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.