2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the crime of this case is committed once, and that the defendant does not have the same criminal record, etc. However, the crime of this case is committed in favor of the defendant, and at the same time, it is not good that the crime of this case infringes the rights of the trademark right holder and damages the consumer's trust, and all the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.