물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,552,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from February 4, 2016 to January 12, 2017, and the following.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the following facts are acknowledged: ① the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for goods supply with the purport that if the plaintiff supplies goods such as fishery products to the defendant, the defendant shall pay the price for the goods; ② the price for the goods unpaid under the above goods supply contract as of February 3, 2016 constitutes 24,52,000.
Therefore, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid amount of goods and damages for delay as stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article.
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.