beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.09.23 2013가단216401

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,580,840 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 6, 2013 to September 23, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) B, while under the influence of alcohol on March 6, 2013, around 00:24, around 00:24, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.215%, CG passenger cars (D ownership, hereinafter referred to as “fested vehicle”).

) The Plaintiff’s taxi (E, Co., Ltd., Ltd., hereinafter referred to as “victim’s taxi”) standing in accordance with the vehicle stop signal and waiting in the signal atmosphere while running along the intersection of the horizontal distance in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu in the east-gu.

(B) The part of the back part of the vehicle in the front part of the vehicle in the Gu, and the part of the vehicle in the front part of the damaged vehicle conflict with the G Garburged car of the FF driver in the signal atmosphere at the front part of the damaged vehicle, and the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the opening of the front part of the back part of the vehicle in the right direction (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to a household vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 3 through 7 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The defendant is obligated to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount.

In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

1) On March 2003, the Plaintiff engaged in the job and income as a taxi driver from March 2003, and on March 2013, 2013.