Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with C Kazon (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is next to D Kazon.

It is an insurer who has entered into a contract for family life liability insurance related to bicycles such as paragraph.

B. On June 28, 2019, the Plaintiff’s driver drivened the Plaintiff’s vehicle and proceeded along the fourth lane of the fourth-lane road in the vicinity of the Daegu Northern-gu E-gu, and entered the Plaintiff’s vehicle by blocking the foregoing bicycle-only road installed separately from the lane due to the boundary seat, etc. in order to enter the instant restaurant as a bypassing the four-lane road, and entering the Plaintiff’s vehicle. On the other hand, the collision between the front wheels of the D Driving’s bicycle, who was straight along the said bicycle-only road (hereinafter “Defendant’s bicycle”), and the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On August 22, 2019, the Plaintiff paid 808,000 won after deducting 202,00 won of the Plaintiff’s automobile repair cost with respect to the instant accident based on the automobile insurance contract for the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 8, images, the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 당사자의 주장 1) 원고의 주장요지 이 사건 사고는, 원고 차량이 피고 자전거 앞에서 우측 식당 주차장으로 진입하기 위해 우측 방향지시등을 켠 가운데 서행 및 일시 정지한 후 자전거전용도로로 진입하여 이를 완전히 점유한 가운데, 전방주시의무를 소홀히 한 채 만연히 과속으로 진행한 피고 자전거 운전자의 전적인 과실 또는 주된 과실로 발생하였다고 할 것이므로, 피고는 원고에게 구상금으로 청구취지와 같은 금액을 지급할 의무가 있다. 2) 피고의 주장요지 이 사건 사고는, 피고 자전거 운전자가 차도와 완전히 분리된 자전거전용도로에서...