When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the father of C in the second year, and the victim D and E are students in the third year.

From ASEAN, the Defendant listened to the statement that D and E assaulted C and damaged C’s cellular phone, and assaulted D and E on September 14, 2018, around 17:00, in the vicinity of Da and E, while the Defendant talked about D and E, the victim E was called “Nin D,” and the victim E was called “D” on one occasion in drinking, and D, which was next thereto, assaulted the victim D’s knife at one time in drinking, and the victim D’s knife, and the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

As such, the Defendant assaulted the victims, thereby inflicting bodily injury on the victims E, such as “satise satons and tensions,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and each of them inflicted bodily injury, such as “satise satise satisfs at the chestheadheadheading,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of a witness, E, G, or H in the fourth protocol of the trial (the purport that there is a fact that he/she has taken the victim's her at least once) of the defendant's partial statement in court;

1. Each written diagnosis (Evidence No. 63, 64 pages);

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel for the investigation report (E and D’s damaged body photographs) claimed that the Defendant had only one time a victim D’s cream, but there was no fact that the Defendant had only once a part of the victim E, or that there was no fact that he had only once a victim’s cream part of the victim E due to drinking, or that he had only once a victim D’s name and a part of the victim D’s cream.

However, the victim E and D stated consistently from investigative agencies to this court that they suffered bodily injury as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and that they also correspond to witness G and H's statements.

On September 15, 2018, the following day of the instant case, the victim E was diagnosed as satise of satis, tensions, and satise damage to satise part of the unknown part of the satise, and the victim D was diagnosed as satise of satise, face impairment, satise damage to satise, satise and open satis.