beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.02.19 2015고단720

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 720"

1. Defendant A, at the G office located in F on October 2012, 2012, lent to the victim H an agreement with the victim H that “The Ha Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine and obtained profit-making business rights, such as the store in the EXPO Doctrine Doctrine.” The 10

“A false representation was made.”

However, on October 20, 2012, Defendant A has been notified of the purport that “The profit-making business operator is scheduled to select it as an open bid, and the said proposal is rejected” around October 2012. Since Defendant A had a debt of approximately two billion won due to other projects at the time, Defendant A was thought to use it for the repayment of the existing debt even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged party, and there was no intention or ability to pay it through a profit-making business in the gardening.

Defendant

A, as above, by deceiving the victim and deceiving it on November 12, 2012, acquired 100 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (J) in the name of the limited company I (J).

2. In collusion with Defendant B on November 14, 2012, Defendant A concluded the MOU on November 16, 2012 at the L coffee shop located in K at the same time.

The phrase “to pay 100 million won at the time of loaning 300 million won” in order to produce clothing, and the above B confirmed that the person in charge of gambling conference was selected as the clothing support company.

To prepare for clothes as soon as possible.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, on October 2012, Defendant A made a proposal for clothing support under the condition that the public official in charge of the Posman Posman should enjoy profit-making business, but around the end of October 2012, Defendant A is selected as an open bid.