beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.24 2013가합517896

소유권보존등기말소 등

Text

1. The defendant on December 27, 1996 to the plaintiffs' real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 2 list of Suwon District Court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The land condition and registration status 1) Nonparty A, the Japanese colonial rule-based party A, the Japanese colonial rule-based party B (hereinafter “B”) around 1911, the Japanese colonial rule-based party B (hereinafter “B”).

C) 1,346 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”).

(2) On May 25, 1923, the deceased A completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land before the instant partition in its name, and on the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the grounds of sale on May 8, 1923 to Non-Party D.) the land before the instant partition was divided into E, E, E, 761, F, 375, G, 210 square meters.

E Return 761 and G Return 210 were prepared on April 8, 1960, and the land register was divided and registered and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Nonparty H.

F. On April 8, 1960, the land register was prepared on April 375, 1960, and the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the network D was transcribed, and the title number in the title section was entered as “I reply 375 square meters.”

After that, the above F 375 square meters became F road 1,240 square meters (the real estate stated in the attached Table 2 list, hereinafter referred to as the "instant land") due to the change of land category.

B. 1) On October 17, 1994, the Defendant registered as the owner on the land cadastre of the instant land, and after publicly announcing the instant land on March 22, 1996, the Suwon District Court’s Ansan registry office received on December 27, 1996, No. 36395 (hereinafter “instant registration of ownership”).

2) On June 7, 2012, a correction was made from “I 375 square meters” to “F 375 square meters on the ground of error finding on April 8, 1960 as to F 375 square meters.

C. 1) The name and address of the network D’s Chinese name and address recorded in the original copy of the former register of the land before the instant partition are consistent with the Plaintiffs’ prior to the Plaintiff’s Chinese name and address. 2) The network D died on or around September 5, 1962, and its heirs were Nonparty KR, Plaintiff L, and M.

(l) the network;