사기등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the court below to the defendant against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that there was an agreement with the victims of the instant fraud and embezzlement, and that the Defendant recognized the crime and is against the depth thereof.
However, the crime of this case was committed by selling at will to another person, embezzlement of the above 50 smartphones, and embezzlement of 50 smartphones, which had been operated as an employee, by selling them with 50 mobilephones, and the crime was committed without a license. In light of the frequency and method of crime, the case is not less than 50,000 won; the defendant was punished by a fine of 50,000 won in Busan District Court on November 21, 2006; 30,000 won in Busan District Court on October 8, 2007; 70,000 won in Busan District Court on February 19, 2009; 1.0,000 won in Busan District Court on August 21, 2009; and 2.01,00 won in Busan District Court on March 3, 2009, which was sentenced to a fine of 10,000 won in Busan District Court on March 1, 2009.