However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, as the representative director of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Co., Ltd., concluded a check contract with a branch office in the center of the National Bank and the defendant from May 18, 2012, and traded the check number per unit.

On June 18, 2012, the Defendant issued two copies of the check number per bank (the total sum of 3,655,550,000 won) in the F Office operated by E in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, namely, “G”, “6.50,000 won”, “date of issuance”, “H”, “H”, “the amount of the check amount”, “date of issuance,” and “two copies of the check number per bank (the total sum of 3,655,00,000 won) in the Defendant’s name, which is the “date of June 29, 2012.” The Defendant presented the check number to the above bank within the period of payment presentment, but the check number “H” was insufficient deposits, and the check number “G” did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each accusation (referred to Serial 1, 7)

1. Article 3 (1), Article 2 (2), and Article 2 (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 3 (1), Article 2 (2), and Article 2 (1);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant reflects his mistake, has no same criminal record, the amount of the check in this case, and