When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has become a customer of the bicycle race track.

On December 5, 2015, the Defendant requested the victim E (44) who manages the bicycle race while photographing the bicycle races in digital cameras without obtaining consent from the manager of the bicycle races located in D D on December 15, 2015 and requesting the victim to suspend and immediately delete the film, but the victim “if any applicable law exists, she will bring about it, she will take such a dog, and head of the team.”

In the case of sick person, the death shall be discarded as soon as possible.

For about 30 minutes, ‘Absing verbal abuse and rashing' interfered with the management of the bicycle racing of the victimized person by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The instant video CD (the term “power of force” of the crime of interference with business means any force that may lead to the suppression and confusion of a person’s free will, either tangible or intangible, or intangible.

The determination of force shall be made objectively in consideration of all the circumstances, such as the date and time and place of the crime, the motive and purpose of the crime, the form of force, the type of work, the status of the victim, etc.

The act of a defendant constitutes the threat of force on the part of a defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's argument shall not be accepted.

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;