beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.03.14 2018고단1473

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall receive or promise money, valuables or other property gains from unspecified persons, and arrange, induce, induce or coerce sexual traffic, or provide a place for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, around 20:10 on February 27, 2018, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by having two male customers visiting a business establishment, who have kept the mixed sea, etc. used for commercial sex acts, receive 100,000 won in cash in return for commercial sex acts, and providing guidance to the room inside the business establishment, and allowing them to have sexual intercourses with two sexual intercourses, such as D employed at the business establishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E, D and F;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. The defendant's assertion shall not be accepted since he/she rejected the defendant's defense without arranging sexual traffic, and he/she sufficiently convicted of the facts charged in this case, according to the evidence mentioned above, including the statement of the crackdown police officers and employees. The defendant's defense is not accepted.

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is including the economic motive for the crime of this case, a fine is selected for the purpose of preventing recidivism; however, it shall be taken into account that the defendant is consistent with the defendant’s unreasonable change and, on the other hand, there is no criminal conviction against the defendant.