beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.05.30 2017가단782

건물 및 토지명도 청구의 소

Text

1. The defendant shall leave the building listed in the attached list No. 1 to the plaintiff, and each real estate listed in the attached list is stated.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. B church (hereinafter “instant church”) in the event of dispute between D and the Defendant

) The Amino Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Amino Association”)

3) The church that was affiliated with the church is the church building listed in the attached list 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant church building”).

(2) Each of the lands listed in [Attachment 2-5], including the instant church building and each of the above lands, shall be “the instant real estate”

2) On March 6, 2012, ANo. 2 held D, which had been a pastor of the instant church, as a senior pastor and appointed the Defendant as a senior pastor.

3) Since July 29, 2012, the Defendant deleted the indication of “Lograph D” from the headquarters of the instant church from July 29, 2012, and D filed a petition with the NAA. 4) After organizing the 7th EM of the instant church in order to grasp the actual situation on May 29, 2013, the NAA summoned the Defendant and D on June 14 and July 5, 2013. On July 21, 2013, the Plaintiff visited the instant church to conduct a verification inspection.

B. On July 14, 2013, when the resolution of 12 persons including the defendant, etc. on July 14, 2013 and the head of the defendant and the head of the E, who were under the investigation of the Plenipotentiary Conference, held a joint conference of the instant church and proposed the following agenda items, and passed the following agenda items with the consent of both the defendant, E, F, G, H, H, I, K, K, L, M, N, N, andO12 present:

The "Resolution of July 14, 2013" is called the "Resolution of July 14, 2013."

(1) Change of the representative: Change of the name of the representative of the instant church from D to the defendant. ② Adjustment of the expulsion of the members and the register of the teachers: From May 2012 to the register of the church of this case, the instant church was removed from D, P, Q, R, S, T, and U 7 who were present at another church without permission, and the instant church members were identified as acquisition by the defendant, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, M, M, NA, M, NA, V, W, and X15 (the defendant, on the same day, 13 others than the defendant and E).

(3) Articles of incorporation.