The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

On February 1, 2013, Defendants 1 conspired to offer 306 Dong-gu E apartment and to borrow money from the victim F, Seo-gu, Cheongju, the owner of Defendant A who falls short of security value, as Defendant A was unable to resolve the bonds borrowed through the introduction of Defendant B.

(1) Defendant 1 and A were indicted as co-offenders of the instant fraud crime.

With respect to A, the lower court sentenced A to a community service order for 2 years and 240 hours of imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and sentenced the Defendant to a imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

With respect to the above judgment of the court below, only the defendant appealed for the following reasons for appeal.

Defendant

A around 15:00 on February 1, 2013, at the office of the H Judicial scrivener located in Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, "E apartment owned by A in the event that the father and mother of A live together and is clean without any problem, E apartments are repaid after calculating the interest rate of 3.5 copies of each month (42% per annum) if they are lent apartments as security.

“A false statement” was made

2. (2) The court below acknowledged the facts charged that A committed a deceitful act as prosecuted on the ground that A was aware of a false statement at the time and place of the crime, although the person who made such a statement directly, at the time and place of the crime.

However, in fact, the above apartment building owned by Defendant A had paid the deposit amount of KRW 100 million (the market price of KRW 135 million) and did not have sufficient collateral value. Defendant A had a debt equivalent to KRW 50 million, and Defendant A did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged party due to lack of particular property.

The defendants deceiving the victim as such and belong to it.