On May 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul; (b) visited the Defendant’s home with a portable phone to “C” case; and (c) contacted the Victim D with the Victim to purchase “Ah-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-

However, the defendant did not have two failed to sell the victim, and even if he did not receive money from the injured party, he did not have the ability or intent to send the above goods to the injured party.

Around May 12, 2018, the Defendant received KRW 270,000 from the injured party to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant, from around May 12, 2018, from that time, the Defendant was transferred KRW 1,489,00 by deceiving the victims eight times from that time until June 18, 2018, as shown in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

No person of the 2018 Highest 3354 shall intermediate another person's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for communications of a third person.

Nevertheless, around May 23, 2018, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, offered a proposal that “the Defendant would open the mobile phone through F” Messens to the Defendant, and sent the Defendant’s identification card, etc. to the Nonparty, thereby enabling the Defendant to open one mobile phone heart chip (number: G) in the name of the Defendant, and allowing the Nonparty to use it, and then received KRW 200,000 from the Nonparty on the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

The defendant of Seongdong-gu Seoul around June 25, 2018 is the defendant's house located in Seongdong-gu Seoul around June 2018.