The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged (excluding the portion not guilty of the grounds) was guilty.

In so determining, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on damages, intentional act, intent to acquire unlawful property, etc. in breach of trust, contrary to what is alleged in

The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.