When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 26, 2019, at around 22:35, the Defendant recommended the victim slope E belonging to the D District District of the Kimpo-si Police Station that he was under the influence of alcohol to return home, and the Defendant used the electronic tobacco in possession of her humb, “ humb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb f to check the Defendant’s personal information, and the Defendant used the Defendant’s humf kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k on both arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers on the 112 Incident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The punishment shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, including the following facts: (a) assaulting a uniform police officer called out after receiving a report on the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the degree of assault is not somewhat weak; (c) the victim police officers do not have any injury; (d) confessioning the facts of the crime; (e) the suspension of execution of the same kind of crime and the criminal records; and (e) there are no criminal records for the same kind of crime; and (e) other