A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (one year of imprisonment) by the court below is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. On the other hand, we examine the judgment and arguments of the public prosecutor and the defendant together with each of the crimes of this case. The defendant miscompetences the errors of the defendant while making a confession of all of the crimes of this case. The amount of the penphones handled by the crimes of this case is relatively small, the defendant actively cooperates with the investigation agency for narcotics-related investigation, such as making a statement to the drug supplier (a one-time upper line) who provided a penphones to the defendant. Meanwhile, the crimes of this case are discovered in possession of the remaining penphones after purchasing a penphone from other narcotics-related crimes, and purchasing the penphones and taking the penphones again, and purchasing them and taking them again and taking them again, there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate the crimes of this case; the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant has been sentenced to 4 times or criminal punishment for the same crime of this case; the defendant has been sentenced to punishment for the punishment of this case for the same crime of this case; the punishment of this case has been mitigated to six months or more.