When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 28, 2015, the Defendant prepared a false statement to the effect that the Defendant driven a vehicle in order to conceal the facts of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of D Traffic Accidents, according to D’s teacher, even though the Defendant did not drive a small-scale vehicle and caused a traffic accident on April 28, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, was allowed to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a statement concerning D concerning the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution;

1. Statement of investigation report (report on the results of telephone recording and investigation, such as a victim);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (No. 12 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 151 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the period of suspension of execution due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the criminal defendant committed the instant crime shall be sentenced to a fine like the order, taking into consideration the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime at a disadvantage, the fact that he/she committed the crime upon the request of pro-Japanese D, the fact that he/she led to the crime at the stage of investigation by the prosecution