2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all crimes while committing the crime, and the fact that the mistake is divided, the funds to repay bonds and the funds to operate a company in the United States due to the difficulties of business after the 1997 foreign exchange crisis, leading to each of the crimes of this case in order to raise funds for repayment of bonds and operating funds in the United States, the aged aged 68 is not good, the entry to the Republic of Korea in order to voluntarily surrenders during the escape life in the United States, and the fact that the judgment of this case was made on November 26, 1998, and that the case should be considered when the judgment becomes final and conclusive

On the other hand, however, the defendant, who had been appointed as professor in 197, escaped to the United States after deceiving the victimJ in 1997 and deceiving him to take advantage of a large amount of money up to 83 million won, not only in the United States, but also in the United States, he has a very poor quality of the crime by deceiving many victims by allowing them to find a job or obtain business rights, and continuously deceiving them to commit the same kind of crime, and there is a record of punishment several times due to the same crime, the victims have been repaid damages or did not agree with the victims, and examining the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. of the defendant, the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is appropriate, and it does not seem that

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.