However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a driver of a low-speed car in B.

around 02:10 on February 28, 2018, the Defendant proceeded to turn to the left in the direction of a new bank from the direction of the CFFC CFD store in the direction of the CFF. On February 28, 2018, the Defendant shocked the front part of the victim E (63) driving driving in the direction of the EFF driving in the direction of the MaFF (63) in the direction of the new bank due to negligence that caused the failure to turn to the left.

As a result, the victim E suffered injury to the victim G (hereinafter referred to as 42) who was on the rocketing car with approximately three weeks' medical treatment, including 417,578 won of the repair cost, while destroying the front panion of the above rocketing car to the extent that the 417,578 won of the repair cost is damaged, and the victim G (hereinafter referred to as 42) was parked without taking necessary measures such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of measures not taken after an accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., reflective points, agreed to with victims, and non-criminal records);