정정보도 등 청구의 소
1. Within 14 days from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant B Co., Ltd. is on the top of the first head of the “E” Program.
Facts of recognition
Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) is a terrestrial broadcasting company that produces and broadcasts the broadcast program “E” (hereinafter “E”), which is a terrestrial broadcasting company that broadcasts “F,” and Defendant C is a production and planning PD of the instant broadcast program, and Defendant D is a PD in charge of the instant broadcast program.
The plaintiff is a professor of the H department of G University, and I is a person who has worked as a research assistant for the plaintiff until the end of November 2016.
On March 13, 2018, the Defendants reported the same content as the attached Table 3 under the title “J” in the instant broadcast program broadcasted by the Defendants.
(2) The Defendants asserted the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the overall purport of the Plaintiff’s statements, images, and pleadings in Gap’s 1 through 3, and Eul’s 1 through 3, respectively, through the instant report, damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly expressing false facts as indicated in the following table, 1, 2, and 3, and 4 as indicated below.
Therefore, pursuant to Articles 14 and 16 of the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Defamation, the Defendants jointly pay KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff’s mental damage caused by tort of defamation, and have the obligation to broadcast prior to the commencement of the broadcast program of this case, as follows: ①, ②, ③, and ③, and ④, the attached Form 2 and the counterargument report stating the Plaintiff’s counterargument as to the above paragraphs.
(Plaintiffs are also subject to indirect compulsory enforcement on correction and counterargument report). See the list of numbers 1. G University graduates I was sexually indecent act by the Plaintiff, who is a guidance professor.
② Although I notified the fact of the Plaintiff’s sexual indecent act to the G University Gender Equality Council and demanded the replacement of a guidance professor, it did not take any measure against the Plaintiff at school, nor did it take any disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff.
(3) At the time of non-prosecution disposition against the plaintiff.