beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고단141

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 14, 2007, in the same court on November 14, 2007, and in the same court on October 15, 2012, a fine of KRW 5,000,000 as the same crime. In addition, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Hegel driver car.

On November 24, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license on November 24, 2013, operated a motor vehicle of Hegel with blood alcohol concentration of 0.180%, and was in the influence of Hegel as his duties, and was in the direction of Hegel's front way of Hegel's oil station in Hegel-dong at the port of Gwangju Mine-gu.

The above place was set up along the center line along the off-distance intersection, and at the same time, at night, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by keeping the front line and maintaining the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) who selected an intersection by wrong selection of lanes, left the area from the boundary of the same mine area to the boundary of the same university; and (b) was negligent in driving the center line by overballing the center while under the influence of alcohol; and (c) led to the victim D (Nam, 52 years old); (d) driven by the victim D (Nam, 52 years old); and (e) driven by the victim E in the opposite lane of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in the above Hegel.

The Defendant caused the above traffic accident and caused the shock to cause the victim D to treat the victim D for about two weeks, and caused the victim F (F, female, 48 years of age) to take care of the damaged vehicle for about two weeks, and caused the same victim G (V) to take care of the scarcity in a scarcity which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and the D statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of an employee will be made;

참조조문