손해배상(기)
1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim extended and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Basic Facts
On October 19, 1948, the Army Headquarters issued an order on October 14, 194 to leave the Republic of Korea for the suppression of the Jeju 43 Incident, and approximately 2,000 military personnel belonging to the 14th joint military forces (hereinafter referred to as "compeach military forces") against this order caused insurrection.
In the past, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the U.S. forces of the Republic of Korea, which had been engaged in the activities in the above area, participated in the insurrection.
In order to suppress this, the government established the Earth Headquarters in Gwangju, declared salt in the area of the Sokcheon, and ordered 2,4,5,12,15 solidaritys in the Army (hereinafter referred to as "suppression forces") to recall the drinking water. On October 24, 1948, the suppression forces started the operations of the sofaging operations and returned the drinking water on October 27, 1948.
In the process, military personnel belonging to the defendant, the water police station, the police station belonging to the female police station, and the police officers belonging to the female police station were killed by at least 124 residents in the first place, such as the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, the infinite, and the infin
(hereinafter “The case of sacrifice to Civilians in Female Areas”). The past History Settlement Committee established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation of the Decision of the past History Settlement Committee for the Reconciliation of Truth (hereinafter “The Act”), received an application for ascertaining the truth of the persons involved in the case of sacrifice to the civilian in the relevant areas, and made a decision on “the confirmation of death” on the basis of witness’s statement, whether he/she has made a professional statement, whether or not he/she has made a professional statement, and whether or not he/she has recovered the body.
In accordance with the above criteria, the past reorganization committee is, in accordance with the foregoing criteria, the networkO, T, W, AA, AF.