2. In light of the fact that the Defendant caused the instant accident by negligence that the Defendant neglected his duty of care and duty to protect pedestrians and caused the injury to the victim, strict punishment should be imposed on the Defendant.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of the Defendant, including the first offender, the Defendant’s violation of the instant crime, the fact that he was subscribed to a motor vehicle comprehensive insurance at the time of the accident, and the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 6 million to the victim, etc., such as age, character, character, environment, accident circumstance, and circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the aforementioned circumstances, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.