beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.27 2019나95680

손해배상(의)

Text

All appeals by the defendant are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence

The fourth 9 and tenth 10th 10th 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance "operation of the defendant hospital" shall be construed as "the user of the medical staff of the defendant hospital".

The 7th judgment of the first instance court shall consist of the following 16 to 19 vehicles:

【A) Although the deceased had the previous medical history of treating cerebral typhism at the time of the instant case, he administered typhin to treat the deceased’s typhism at the time of the instant case, he responded to the purport that the diagnosis of the first instance court’s medical record is likely to cause cerebral typhism as an anti-pism, and that the appraisal of the deceased’s cerebral typhism is also likely to cause side effects of the pharmacologic, and there is no other evidence to deem that cerebral typhism was caused by the deceased’s typhism regardless of the above typhin medication. Furthermore, it is reasonable to deem that the cerebral typhism symptoms caused to the deceased due to the side effects of the typhism administered in the process of treating typhism. Furthermore, there is no evidence to deem that the above typhin was inappropriate in the process of treating the deceased’s typhal typhism, and that there was no possibility that the treatment of the deceased’s first diagnosis of the ty.