If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

From October 2012 to December 2012 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) drafted an agreement with the victim on December 13 of the same year, who was the victim E, who was the owner of the building, to lease and operate the Damotobel B from October 2012 to operate it jointly with D; and (b) ordered the victim to surrender the Mamototo.

1. On January 7, 2013, from around 09:19 to 13:40 of the same day, the Defendant asserted that the agreement was null and void, and did not comply with the victim’s demand that “in the Republic of Korea, it is the owner of the telecom, and the owner of the telecom.”

2. The defendant shall leave from the victim at the same place on the same day, around 19:27, and for the same reason;

Even after receiving the Gu, the Gu did not comply with it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of E and M;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A investigation report (CCTV screen analysis) on CCTV screen to be established;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the copy of business registration certificate, copy of business registration certificate, copy of written agreement, and copy of briefs;

1. Article 319 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;