The Defendant, at around 15:50 on March 11, 2016, is not able to read the name in detail to the members of the following carpet, “C,” but begins from the meal, and the Defendant is the president another.

Preparation and transmission of the page of “the victim D” publicly insulting the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on the details of posting;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement (The circumstances favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1448, Apr. 1, 20

The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the Defendant’s first damaged person’s advertisement notice in the Marina branch office of the Marina branch office of the Marina branch office:

for more than one year, and good-quality needs for each individual;

In addition, I have the meanings of fishing.

“The Defendant did not have any intention to insult the victim of the crime, as he was asked to know the detailed contents from the non-member of the name, and sent the same page as the statement of the crime.

In addition, the defendant's act of sending the victim's insult to the non-name member was recognized without the legitimacy of the motive or purpose, and it was recognized that the reasonableness of the means and method is recognized or urgent and inevitable means.

In full view of the above, the above argument is without merit.

another.