All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Plaintiff A, E, F, G (hereinafter “victims”) and H (hereinafter “victims”) are students who were enrolled in the first grade of D Middle School as of December 10, 2018, and Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

B. The Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence at D Middle Schools (hereinafter “instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting on December 21, 2018 (hereinafter “instant meeting”) and decided to take measures against aggressor students pursuant to the former Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (amended by Act No. 16441, Aug. 20, 2019; hereinafter “former Act on the Prevention of School Violence”).

Pursuant to Article 2 [Attachment Table] of the detailed guidelines applicable to each measure against aggressor students against school violence (Notice No. 2016-99 of the Ministry of Education on August 31, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the "detailed guidelines of this case"), the resolution of the plaintiff A at the meeting of this case was made as follows; the remaining aggressor students were given 12, 12, and 8 points each with the total judgment points of the basic judgment factors; and all of them were decided on written apologys under Article 17 (1) of the former School Violence Prevention Act (No. 1); three days of service at school (No. 2); 1 day of special education under paragraph (3) of the same Article; and 4 hours of special education of guardians under paragraph (9) of the same Article.

In light of the fact that (1) high (3), high (4), high (3), high (4), and lower (3), 14, and the statement of related students, the role of many of the students who have committed school violence against victim students is recognized in the course of investigating the case that was conducted after school violence.