However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 3, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the restaurant of the victim by force, such as by drinking while drinking alcohol in the D’s packing mar, operated by the victim C in the Sanandong-gu B market on a day-to-day basis, Ansan-si on June 3, 2018. The Defendant obstructed the operation of the restaurant of the victim by force, by having 1 male customers go against the disturbance, such as drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, etc.

2. On June 3, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around 19:20 on June 3, 2018, issued a report on the said act at around 112, and called up, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the circumstances belonging to the E Zone in the Police Station Ethmbling Station, F, and G that the Defendant

Gaz. Gaz. Gaz.

"I would like to get the front F of the Defendant's head at one time, and attempted to seize the electronic shock machine in the police that was driven by the Blue of the two arms, and it was committed by assaulting the flue part as the flue was not achieved while she was trying to seize the electronic shock machine in the police.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site CCTV images;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime, and the choice of imprisonment for a definite term;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish the accused with violence to police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, in order to establish the State’s legal order.

However, the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect the wrongness of the defendant.

A relatively long-term criminal convictions, but there are no other criminal convictions of the same kind or of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.

The victim shall be a victim with interference with business.