At around 22:50 on October 12, 2015, the Defendant received 112 reports to the effect that the Defendant knife the knife at “Ccafeteria” located in the original city B, and received notice of penalty payment from E and policeman F as a drinking disturbance, the Defendant assaulted the said E’s breast part by hand, while taking a bath that the Anife would not put in the house.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Application of ten copies of field photographs to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, exercised violence against police officers who perform legitimate official duties under the influence of alcohol.

However, there is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant's wrong and there is no record of criminal punishment.

Such circumstances and the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, the details of the crime and circumstances after the crime are committed shall be determined as per Disposition.