2. The judgment requirement is that the defendant's negligence of driving a vehicle in violation of the signal causes an injury to three victims, and the responsibility of the victim A is not weak by destroying the vehicle of the victim, and that the defendant did not agree with the victims or recover from the damage, etc. is an unfavorable sentencing condition against the defendant.

However, in full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime of this case, the Defendant’s punishment of this case is too unreasonable, and thus, it is not recognized that the Defendant’s punishment of this case is too unreasonable, and the degree of injury suffered by the victims is not severe, and there is no record of criminal punishment except for a punishment of a fine once due to a drunk driving, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.