Provided, That the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Crimes committed on April 25, 2019;

A. At around 01:00 on April 25, 2019, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, 2019, was enjoying together with the Victim C (Gain name, 32 years of age). As to the victim’s cell phone, the Defendant asked the victim’s cell phone that the phone from the victim’s male employer’s male employer’s pay to the victim “a person’s son’s son’s son’s

While the defendant was in a dispute, he was able to see the victim's body "Ara in his house" and was able to see the victim's body in order to go out of the house in order to go out of the house, was able to see the victim's body in his inner room, placed the victim's body in his inner room, placed the victim's kne, knee at one time with the victim's body, made the victim's knee with the victim's body knee with the victim's kne and knee with the victim's body.

The defendant continued to take the face of the victim over by hand, forced the victim to enter the victim's sexual organ rapidly, and rapes by inserting the victim's sexual organ into the victim's sexual organ into the victim's sexual organ.

B. A violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”), the Defendant, while committing the above crimes, taken pictures of the images of the victim who was quickly using the Defendant’s smartphone, and of the victim’s sexual organ inserted the Defendant’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ in the victim’s sexual organ.

A prosecutor was indicted by the defendant who had taken a video photograph on five occasions, but it is merely that a number of video files have been created by cutting a single rape and making it difficult to view it as a single photograph.

ARTICLE 1-e

the crime described in subsection (1).

C. On April 25, 2019, the Defendant forced the victim to make a phone call at the victim’s company on or around April 25, 2019, demanding that “The Defendant recorded the contents of conversation on why he/she made a phone call, and written the contents of how he/she had been friendly with the workplace rent, and do not do so.”