However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C who has been divorced three years before the victim C, but is living together.

On March 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in front of the “E” store located in D at the time of light lighting around 16:20; (b) caused the injury to the victim, she was able to bleep the victim’s body at several times due to a defect that the victim, who was danced in the call architecture, and was able to see the victim’s body at several times; and (c) went beyond the victim’s body at several times, and she was in need of approximately 8 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflective facts of the defendant, and the agreement with the victim);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) and the proviso to Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 or more of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection;