beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.30 2014고단1878

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

789,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 12, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on June 12.

1. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On March 16, 2014, at around 22:00 to 23:00, the Defendant administered a psychotropic drug, which is a psychotropic drug that was received from a fluor, and kept in custody, in the vicinity of the D parking lot located in Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, by burning it into a beer (one-time medication in size of rice).

2. "2014 Highest 3006".

A. On October 26, 2013, around 18:00, the Defendant sold approximately 0.5g of psychotropic drugs to E, a psychotropic drug, at a restaurant near the Mangnwon-dong 3, Daegu-gu, Nowon-gu, Daegu-gu, for approximately 500,000 won.

B. Around 05:00 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant granted approximately 0.21g of philopon to H at Gel in the Daegu Seo-gu F.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Test report (the fact referred to in Article 2 at the time of marketing);

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and E;

1. The second statement made to the accused in part of the investigation records of the prosecution (including the statement of the E in the investigation records, not more than 252 pages of the investigation records);

1. Statement of the prosecutorial statement concerning I;

1. A copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H by the prosecution;

1. The details of each currency (1:31 31 / 2 / 156 / 156 / each investigation record) (31 / 156 / The defendant asserts that there is no fact that he/she sold phiphones to E or delivered phiphones to H. However, according to the witness H and E's statements with a consistent and consistent method of committing the crime and each telephone call contents, etc., it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant sold phiphones to E and delivered phiphones to H as stated in the judgment of the court below) (The investigation report (verification of repeated crimes, etc.) and the application of the law in the status of individual reduction/

1. Criminal facts;