The Defendant, when working as an employee in the “E” factory for the operation of the victim DD in Hasung City, was aware of the fact that he would come from the dormitory that was offered without receiving a monthly wage as agreed.

On April 24, 2015, at around 21:20, the Defendant, at the above E plant, set a fire to the galle in the factory floor with a stringer who was in possession of a shower room at the factory floor, and set the galle on the floor, set the galle on the floor, set the galle on the floor, and made the galle on the floor of the galth factory and the galle-type type 3, etc. located therein.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the amount equivalent to KRW 312,892,983, such as the amount of damage caused by the D owner's structure and the type of emulsion in the structure.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site CCTV photographs, factory machinery photographs, machinery and specifications of household fixtures;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a fire (fire-proof fire), each investigation report (Evidence List Nos. 3 and 11), report on the results of field identification, results of field identification, results of field identification on a fire site inspection, and applications

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 166 (1) of the Criminal Act with respect to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than thirty years;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] and the general criteria for fire-fighting crimes: there is no person who has a type 2 (Setting fire to general buildings, etc.) (decision of the recommended area] (decision of the recommended area] basic area (decision of the recommended area] [the scope of recommendations] imprisonment with labor for a year and six months to three years.

3. The crime of this case in which the defendant has committed the crime of this case, which caused a dispute over the president and working conditions of the factory he had worked for, and caused a fire by intentionally setting fire to the factory and the shooting type type, etc. which had been located therein, and the crime of this case is very poor. The crime of this case causes serious economic damage exceeding KRW 300 million to the victim, and even though it did not pay compensation to the victim, the victim is punished by the defendant.