손해배상(자)
1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 95,372,90, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B and each of the said money, the Defendant shall start from October 5, 2012 to 205.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) C is the Defendant’s vehicle at around 14:37 October 5, 2012 (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).
2) On the other hand, the Plaintiff Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company
(2) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 8, 9, Eul evidence 1 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
(c) limitation of liability, however, that the defendant's liability is limited to 80% in consideration of the fact that the plaintiff A has a duty of care to ensure the safety of the vehicle that proceeds from walking along the road in the apartment complex, as well as to ensure the fair sharing of damages.
(2) Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, it is identical to each corresponding item of the attached Table 1 for the calculation of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but the amount of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.
The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.
In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.
Personal information: The term "basic matters" in the attached Form 1 calculation sheet shall be as stated.
However, the plaintiff A.