폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant took D’s hand in order to prevent the Defendant from causing harm to the Defendant’s wife; and (b) the victim, who was under the influence of alcohol, fladdddddddddddddly pushedly pushed the victim with his intent to commit an assault, such as flading the Defendant’s bat, etc.; and (c) the Defendant’s act of assault constitutes self-defense or legitimate act; and (d) even though
2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the records of this case, the defendant's wife and D, who is in charge of general affairs of Pyeongtaek B apartment, stated the facts charged of this case and the facts charged of this case as stated in the judgment below, and the records of this case, it is clear that the above "name-free money" is "D, which is a B apartment resident. It was not good for some of the above apartment residents, including Eul. At the time of the occurrence of this case, some of the residents of B apartment including D, who talk with the defendant's wife before the first floor of the above apartment, and the defendant's wife attached D with D's arms and sealed it to the wall. Accordingly, the victim, who was in this case, could have strongly acknowledged the facts of the defendant's selling, and there was no other evidence that "the defendant's act of attack and investigation" or "the defendant's act of attack and investigation" prepared by the defendant to the investigation agency.
When the defendant confirms CCTV installed at the place where this case occurred in an investigative agency, he/she may confirm that the victim has committed an offence first.