손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The premise is that the Plaintiff, as the owner of B 25.5t dump trucks (hereinafter “instant truck”), runs the business of transporting earth and sand, etc., Defendant Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “former Engineering”) carries out the construction of the Hyundai Moscing Test site (hereinafter “instant construction”) at the asbestos in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, and Defendant New Mosss Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “new Mosced Construction”) and Defendant Hoho Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Mosced Development”) were subcontracted or sub-subcontracted for the said construction.
Around 195, Hyundai-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-do (hereinafter “the instant embankment”) was owned by the State as agricultural infrastructure installed by Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Modern Construction”) while performing reclamation works of public waters in accordance with the Public Waters Management and Reclamation Act in around 1995, and was installed for use as agriculture by putting the bank above the earth and sand and gravel.
The Plaintiff was entrusted with the transportation of earth and sand from the Defendant Hoho Development Co., Ltd., and the Plaintiff had C drive the instant truck to transport earth and sand to the construction site of the construction site of Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seonam-gun, Seonam-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, Seonam-gun, Seosan-gun, a collection site of earth and sand located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si.
C On May 21, 2014, around 16:00, when driving the instant truck, there was an accident in which the instant truck is loaded with earth and sand at the collection place and the vehicle was moved to the instant embankment while operating the instant embankment (hereinafter “instant accident”).
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 5, Gap evidence 3-1, 2-2, Eul evidence 1-1 through 6, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2-1 to 4, Eul's witness's partial testimony, the result of inquiry of modern construction of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion Defendants are the contractor of the instant construction project or sewage supply.