When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is C minor shareholders, the victim D is the representative of C's Union of Minor Stockholders, and the C's shares were suspended from trading, and the minority shareholders established Kakao Organization Stockholm for collective activities.

1. On April 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) was an clinic called “E” at C Kakao Group Stockholm, and “The subdivision of the representative or higher of the tenant’s year was off at the time when the F M&C was discovered to the lender and the descendant.”

It is necessary to clarify that the evidence of the part intentionally committed in the closure may be legally responsible for the so-called so-called so-called so-called 'normy'.

It is time to see the important facts that have not been informed of the parts that are appropriate in front and rear and of the minor shareholders.

I would like to enter the legal procedure in the case of notification by the internal date.

In addition, even in the case of closure, I have been prepared to see the well-fluence of sunshine as well as the case of closure.

Even now, it is rare to ask the lender to the meaning of the warning of time to change the direction to resume transactions by acquiring the lender.

It would be big if the damage to society and the surrounding areas would be caused by the damage. “D, after asking Dog, the need to confirm the fact.”

(hereinafter referred to as "(hereinafter omitted)" and describe the purport that the victim who is the representative of the Union of Small and Medium Stockholders has intentionally been in alliance with a major shareholder and has been in suspension of transaction of C&A.

However, if there is a plan that G and H can live as a major shareholder of C in order to ensure that the transaction is resumed after the suspension of transaction as a minority shareholder, the victim will cooperate with the minority shareholder.

There was only a fact that there was no intention to suspend trading or to abolish listing of C&A by combining with a major shareholder.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as mentioned above, stated false facts, and thereafter, from that time.