around 15:00 on April 26, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages filed by the said court against 548594 C, etc. at the court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 562, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the lawsuit filed by the said court against 548594 C (the chairperson of the committee for the management of the above

The Defendant sent to the witness on July 29 (2016), “E.jpg” (F division, Inc., an advertising agent) G sent the accompanying file to the witness on July 29, 2016;

G The head of the G Do shall not have the real name of “C Attorney” in the E-examination box to the witness, and there is a fact that the words in the advertisement letter should also be changed and the witness should not be advertised for the E-examination in accordance with the advertisement text sent by the witness;

Earba required

“I shall not answer the question of the said C’ Counsel;

The author was H only farcing, but farcing

testimony and continued to be asked “(G director) with the content recorded in the recording book;

If the Section G director talks with the witness, it is necessary that the Section G director talks with the witness;

Earba required

“E is not a “E” in the inquiry of the said counsel;

H His Excellency

“The testimony was made.”

However, in the process of promoting a malicious advertisement against C published in the E newspaper company around August 4, 2016, there is a fact that the Defendant is unable to publish an advertisement in the E newspaper company in a state where C’s real name is entered from the above G.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a witness of a letter, made a false statement contrary to his memory, and perjury.

2. According to the records, the G division of the F Co., Ltd.’s G division is a question of “I’s J attorney-at-law, who first received a request from E.jp file from E and sent it to the Defendant.”