손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of each of the following parts to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
The third and sixth evidence of the judgment of the first instance court is added to the "Evidence No. 15 (Statement of Witness)".
The following instructions shall be added to the fourth three pages of the judgment of the first instance.
⑤ On March 3, 2016, before being supplied with the instant facilities by the Defendant, the Plaintiff was determined as Satisory by having the inspector belonging to the Plaintiff, who was a contractor of the instant facilities, conduct a flood control inspection on the said facilities, and as a result, conducted around March 8, 2016, it is difficult to deem that there is any defect in the instant facilities even in light of the fact that the results of the flood control inspection and the landing inspection conducted around March 8, 2016 were determined as “Accet.”
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.