A. On October 18, 2018, Defendant B’s assertion insultingd the Plaintiff, such as “Is that he did not know about, but did not know about, any other person, and that Is that he would like to say, that Is that Is to say, “Is to say that Is to say, Is to say, Is to say that Is to say, Is to say that Is to say, Is to be responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for mental damage caused by such tort.”

B. In light of the judgment, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that Defendant B insultd the Plaintiff due to Defendant B’s abusive behavior as alleged by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

(On the other hand, the plaintiff is liable for joint tort with defendant C, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it). Therefore, the above assertion by the plaintiff is without merit.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. Upon the occurrence of tort liability 1) Gap evidence Nos. 15 and 16 (including serial numbers) added the purport of the entire pleadings, defendant C, from the entrance of the above apartment E-dong around October 19, 2018, stated that "I am out of F, I am out of the above apartment E-dong entrance", "I am out of this knife and live together with it," and am out of the above court on December 17, 2019 due to the crime of insult, 50,000 won was convicted by the above court on December 17, 2019 (2019Da206), and that the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 25, 2019. According to the above facts of recognition, the above defendant C had a duty to compensate the plaintiff for mental harm caused by the above tort, and thus, the plaintiff was obviously suffering from mental harm on the part of the plaintiff on December 18, 2019.